Skip to content

What fossils tell us about prehistoric microbes

June 24, 2010

Kevin’s latest post is about how babies first acquire the suite of microbes (their microflora) that form the beginning of the community that will live within them for the rest of their life.  This is one example of symbiosis (two organisms living together) involving microbes, but there are countless others.  The list below is just a few of the better known examples.

The environment that I study (hydrothermal vents) is also rife with microbial symbioses, but these are slightly different because they are what is called chemoautotrophic.  This means that they get their energy from electrons they garner from environmental chemicals rather than the sun (as in photosynthesis), but, like photosynthesizers, they get their carbon from an inorganic source (typically CO2) rather than an organic source.  One of the most common inorganic energy sources in vent ecosystems is hydrogen sulfide, which is found in abundance at vents.  Other chemicals such as methane, sulfur, hydrogen, ammonia, and certain forms of iron are also used.  Over evolutionary time, some of the animals that developed these symbioses have lost their own feeding structures.  Certain tube worms, for example, have no mouth, no gut, and no anus.  They rely completely on the microbes in their trophosome (an internal microbe-holding organ) to provide them with all of their nutrients.

Last night I came across a very cool study from 2000, entitled where a case is made that a certain group of trilobites may have had chemoautotrophic symbionts.  This would make them the oldest known organisms to have developed this type of partnership.  You can read it for yourself, here, but the gist is as follows.  This group of trilobites has been found in sedimentary rock layers that indicate they lived in a low oxygen, high sulfide environment.  The fossil record shows that they lack the typical trilobite feeding structure (the hypostome), which they likely lost as the symbiosis made these structures unnecessary (why have a mouth if you don’t eat?), and is (according to the author) “difficult to explain any other way”.  The fossils that were examined also show some body structures (extended pleural areas and multiplied thorasic segments) that are enlarged and duplicated, possibly as a space to cultivate the microbial symbionts.  This is the type of adaptation that we see today in modern day organisms that host such symbioses.

Interpreting fossils is certainly a challenging task, and one such hypotheses are often challenging to disprove (lacking a time machine), but I think it is extremely cool that these types of interpretations can be made about ancient microbes and co-evolution, based on what we know about modern host organisms, and the fossil record.

Advertisements
2 Comments leave one →
  1. kevbonham permalink*
    June 24, 2010 6:41 pm

    Sweet – but what do the microbes get out of this symbiosis?

    And couldn’t you make the argument that mitochondia/chloroplasts are the oldest form of this arrangement?

    • heatholins permalink
      June 24, 2010 7:17 pm

      In the case of hydrothermal vents the microbes get a place to hang out where the chemicals they need get delivered because the animals hang out in the optimal locations. Free living microbes in the water are subject to water circulation patterns and minimal concentrations of many important chemicals. I have to assume that the same would hold true for the trilobites… the microbes get a safe place to live with abundant nutrients… a more stable environment than the ocean water itself.

      Yes… the mitochondrea/chloroplast would certainly be an older symbiosis… although I wouldn’t necessarily say oldest. There are plenty of microbe-microbe symbiosis where one produces a chemical the other needs and vice versa (likely why many environmental microbes are so difficult to culture) that probably developed long before eukaryotes did. Additionally, the chloroplast/mitochondria is certainly a symbiosis, but not a chemoautotrophic one.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: